Kasa\u010dn\u00ed st\u00ed\u017enost, kterou podalo m\u011bsto Trutnov proti rozsudku Krajsk\u00e9ho soudu v Brn\u011b, byla ne\u00fasp\u011b\u0161n\u00e1.<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n \u00da\u0159ad pro ochranu hospod\u00e1\u0159sk\u00e9 sout\u011b\u017ee ulo\u017eil m\u011bstu Trutnov p\u0159ed lety pokutu ve v\u00fd\u0161\u00ed 50 000 K\u010d za sp\u00e1ch\u00e1n\u00ed spr\u00e1vn\u00edho deliktu, jen\u017e spo\u010d\u00edval v nevylou\u010den\u00ed uchaze\u010de \u201cSdru\u017een\u00ed BAK a PROFIL N\u00c1BYTEK\u201d z \u00fa\u010dasti v zad\u00e1vac\u00edm \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed na ve\u0159ejnou zak\u00e1zku „Spole\u010densk\u00e9 centrum Trutnovska pro kulturu a voln\u00fd \u010das – dod\u00e1vka vybaven\u00ed interi\u00e9ru“ (UFFO).<\/p>\n [related-post id=“2499″]<\/p>\n „Sdru\u017een\u00ed BAK a PROFIL N\u00c1BYTEK“ tehdy ve v\u00fdb\u011brov\u00e9m \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed v roce 2010 podalo nab\u00eddku, kter\u00e1 byla o dva miliony v\u011bt\u0161\u00ed, ne\u017e nab\u00eddky ostatn\u00edch dvou \u00fa\u010dastn\u00edk\u016f \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed. Hodnotic\u00ed komise na z\u00e1klad\u011b chyby v podan\u00e9 nab\u00eddce vyzvala uchaze\u010de o p\u0159edlo\u017een\u00ed dodate\u010dn\u00fdch informac\u00ed. Uchaze\u010d komisi informoval, \u017ee omylem uvedl nespr\u00e1vn\u00fd po\u010det kus\u016f, tj. 90 nam\u00edsto po\u017eadovan\u00fdch 9 kus\u016f v polo\u017ece \u010d. 26. T\u00edm do\u0161lo k v\u00fdpo\u010dtu nespr\u00e1vn\u00e9 nab\u00eddkov\u00e9 ceny 7 246 400 K\u010d bez DPH. Spr\u00e1vn\u00e1 cena po oprav\u011b \u010dinila 5 798 039 K\u010d bez DPH.<\/p>\n Hodnot\u00edc\u00ed komise vysv\u011btlen\u00ed a opravu nab\u00eddkov\u00e9 ceny uchaze\u010de tehdy p\u0159ijala, nab\u00eddku hodnotila ji\u017e podle upraven\u00e9 nab\u00eddkov\u00e9 ceny a vyhodnotila ji jako nejvhodn\u011bj\u0161\u00ed.<\/p>\n \u00da\u0159ad pro hospod\u00e1\u0159skou sout\u011b\u017e (\u00daOHS) ud\u011blil za toto pochyben\u00ed m\u011bstu Trutnov pokutu ve v\u00fd\u0161i pades\u00e1t tis\u00edc korun. D\u00edky chyb\u011b p\u0159\u00ed v\u00fdb\u011brov\u00e9m \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed p\u0159i\u0161lo m\u011bsto o dal\u0161\u00ed dotace za zhruba 360 tis\u00edc korun. Proti tomuto rozhodnut\u00ed m\u011bsto Trutnov podalo kasa\u010dn\u00ed st\u00ed\u017enost, ve kter\u00e9 mimo jin\u00e9 uv\u00e1d\u011blo, \u017ee \u0161lo pouze o po\u010detn\u00ed chybu, d\u00edky kter\u00e9 byla cena nab\u00eddky vy\u0161\u0161\u00ed, ne\u017e byl z\u00e1m\u011br uchaze\u010de. Nejvy\u0161\u0161\u00ed spr\u00e1vn\u00ed soud se ov\u0161em ztoto\u017enil s krajsk\u00fdm soudem, \u017ee nab\u00eddkov\u00e1 cena m\u011bn\u011bna b\u00fdt nemohla. M\u011bsto Trutnov ji\u017e p\u0159ed dv\u011bma lety rozhodlo o tom, \u017ee pod\u00e1 v p\u0159\u00edpad\u011b ne\u00fasp\u011b\u0161n\u00e9ho spr\u00e1vn\u00edho \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed \u017ealobu na firmu, kter\u00e1 administrovala tehdej\u0161\u00ed v\u00fdb\u011brov\u00e9 \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed na dodavatele zak\u00e1zky pro SCT UFFO. Rada m\u011bsta Trutnova o tom hlasovala na sv\u00e9m zased\u00e1n\u00ed dne 1. 6. 2015 a odsouhlasila pod\u00e1n\u00ed \u017ealoby na n\u00e1hradu \u0161kody ve v\u00fd\u0161i 50 000 K\u010d na Ingeniring Krkono\u0161e a.s. do roku 2018 tak, aby nedo\u0161lo k proml\u010den\u00ed t\u00e9to pohled\u00e1vky.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Kasa\u010dn\u00ed st\u00ed\u017enost, kterou podalo m\u011bsto Trutnov proti rozsudku Krajsk\u00e9ho soudu v Brn\u011b, byla ne\u00fasp\u011b\u0161n\u00e1. \u00da\u0159ad pro ochranu hospod\u00e1\u0159sk\u00e9 sout\u011b\u017ee ulo\u017eil m\u011bstu Trutnov p\u0159ed lety pokutu ve v\u00fd\u0161\u00ed 50 000 K\u010d za sp\u00e1ch\u00e1n\u00ed spr\u00e1vn\u00edho deliktu, jen\u017e spo\u010d\u00edval v nevylou\u010den\u00ed uchaze\u010de \u201cSdru\u017een\u00ed BAK a PROFIL N\u00c1BYTEK\u201d z \u00fa\u010dasti v zad\u00e1vac\u00edm \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed na ve\u0159ejnou zak\u00e1zku „Spole\u010densk\u00e9 centrum Trutnovska […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":27,"featured_media":8649,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_exactmetrics_skip_tracking":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_active":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_note":"","_exactmetrics_sitenote_category":0,"_mi_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[343],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.trutnovak.cz\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/UFFO-bak-trutnov.jpg?fit=650%2C412&ssl=1","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p57GOQ-2ft","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.trutnovak.cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8647"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.trutnovak.cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.trutnovak.cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.trutnovak.cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/27"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.trutnovak.cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8647"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.trutnovak.cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8647\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8652,"href":"https:\/\/www.trutnovak.cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8647\/revisions\/8652"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.trutnovak.cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/8649"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.trutnovak.cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8647"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.trutnovak.cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8647"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.trutnovak.cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8647"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
\nM\u011bsto Trutnov se obr\u00e1tilo na Krajsk\u00fd soud, ten v\u0161ak postup \u00daOHS nezpochybnil. Soud tehdy konstatoval, \u017ee po pod\u00e1n\u00ed nab\u00eddky uchaze\u010dem ji\u017e skute\u010dn\u011b nelze prov\u00e1d\u011bt \u017e\u00e1dn\u00e9 dal\u0161\u00ed zm\u011bny v nab\u00eddkov\u00e9 cen\u011b.<\/p>\n
\n\u201cV\u00fdklad krajsk\u00e9ho soudu je zalo\u017een na extr\u00e9mn\u00ed form\u00e1lnosti, co\u017e je v neprosp\u011bch zadavatel\u016f i uchaze\u010d\u016f o ve\u0159ejn\u00e9 zak\u00e1zky. Zadavatel\u00e9 jsou vedeni zejm\u00e9na snahou o dodr\u017een\u00ed principu hospod\u00e1rnosti p\u0159i vynakl\u00e1d\u00e1n\u00ed ve\u0159ejn\u00fdch prost\u0159edk\u016f. Takto p\u0159\u00edsn\u00fd v\u00fdklad v\u0161ak znamen\u00e1 nutnost vylou\u010den\u00ed ka\u017ed\u00e9ho uchaze\u010de i se z\u0159ejmou a lehce opravitelnou chybou v nab\u00eddce. Nab\u00eddky jsou vypracov\u00e1v\u00e1ny lidmi, a proto z povahy v\u011bci k chyb\u00e1m doch\u00e1zet m\u016f\u017ee. Pr\u00e1vo by se tedy s t\u00edmto faktem m\u011blo po\u010d\u00edtat a umo\u017enit opravit takov\u00e9 chyby z\u0159ejm\u00fdm <\/em><\/strong>a p\u0159ezkoumateln\u00fdm zp\u016fsobem.\u201d<\/em><\/strong> Uv\u00e1d\u00ed ve sv\u00e9 kasa\u010dn\u00ed st\u00ed\u017enosti m\u011bsto Trutnov.<\/p>\n
\n„V nyn\u00ed posuzovan\u00e9 v\u011bci byla nab\u00eddka m\u011bn\u011bna ve prosp\u011bch zadavatele, co\u017e nelze v obecn\u00e9 rovin\u011b zcela vylou\u010dit, nicm\u00e9n\u011b takov\u00e1 zm\u011bna je zcela vylou\u010dena v p\u0159\u00edpad\u011b, kdy m\u00e1 vliv na hodnocen\u00ed nab\u00eddek, co\u017e jednozna\u010dn\u011b m\u011bla. P\u0159ipu\u0161t\u011bn\u00ed mo\u017enosti prov\u00e1d\u011bt po\u010detn\u00ed opravy v polo\u017ekov\u00fdch rozpo\u010dtech s vlivem na celkovou nab\u00eddkovou cenu by znamenalo p\u0159ipustit mo\u017enost i z\u00e1m\u011brn\u011b d\u011blat chyby v polo\u017ekov\u00fdch rozpo\u010dtech, kdy podle v\u00fdvoje zad\u00e1vac\u00edho \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed by uchaze\u010d zvolil to vysv\u011btlen\u00ed, kter\u00e9 by mu v danou chv\u00edli bylo ku prosp\u011bchu. Takov\u00fdch chyb by nav\u00edc mohl ud\u011blat v\u00edce a ka\u017edou vysv\u011btlovat jinak, aby vy\u0161la pr\u00e1v\u011b ta spr\u00e1vn\u00e1 hodnota.“<\/em><\/strong> Uv\u00e1d\u00ed se v rozsudku Nejvy\u0161\u0161\u00edho spr\u00e1vn\u00edho soudu p\u0159edseda sen\u00e1tu JUDr. Radan Mal\u00edk.<\/p>\n